United Kingdom · CAP Code · landing pages

HEPA filtration efficiency claims on UK landing pages — CAP literacy

Air-care appliance pages use True HEPA badges, micron capture percentages and EN 1822 class lines beside CADR and room-size tables. Shoppers often read filtration numbers as guaranteed whole-room outcomes without opening test footnotes. This guide helps UK marketers inventory HEPA strings on live URLs. Not ASA clearance and not legal advice.

Not ASA clearance. Not legal advice. CiteBefore inventories advertising claims and evidence columns. The ASA decides complaints.

Free scan  ·  £29 Register  ·  £79/mo Watch

HEPA and high-efficiency filtration heroes on appliance pages

Air purifier, vacuum cleaner and HVAC accessory landing pages stack HEPA badges, micron capture percentages and allergen removal claims beside lifestyle photography. Shoppers often treat the headline efficiency as guaranteed in every room size without opening airflow tables.

Under CAP Code 3.7, objective filtration performance claims need substantiation — marketers inventory exact numeric strings before seasonal indoor-air campaigns.

Cross-read noise level decibel claims, energy efficiency rating claims, and allergen-free claims.

Common HEPA wording patterns

StringShopper readRegister note
True HEPA 99.97% at 0.3 µmMedical-grade captureConfirm EN 1822 class if cited
HEPA-type / HEPA-likeWeaker promiseDo not merge with True HEPA row
Captures 99.9% of allergensRoom air outcomeBaseline pollutant named if claimed
Washable HEPA filterMaintenance claimSeparate from efficiency row
Hospital-grade filtrationInstitutional benchmarkScope facility type if implied

Room size, CADR and system boundaries

Clean air delivery rate figures may appear in footnotes while heroes cite HEPA efficiency only — log CADR tables separately from filter media claims.

Combo units mixing humidifier and purifier functions must scope which modes were tested — do not merge humidification outcomes with HEPA rows.

See bundle pricing claims and comparative vs competitor claims.

Worked example

Hero: “True HEPA H13 filter captures 99.95% of particles at 0.3 µm — tested to EN 1822.” Spec tab lists model AP-400 and max room 40 m². Literacy notes:

Common misreadings

Desk checklist

CheckPass hint
Hero matches filter datasheetSame class and micron point
HEPA-type vs True HEPA splitNo shorthand drift
Room size / CADR scopedSeparate register rows
Marketplace feed loggedSeparate from consumer URL
Agency handoff registerAgency handoff guide

Fragrance-free and clinical adjacency

Fragrance-free claims describe absence of perfume — they do not substantiate particulate capture percentages on the same hero.

Dermatologically tested lines concern skin protocols — unrelated to inlet filtration unless copy incorrectly links them.

See fragrance-free claims and dermatologically tested claims.

Promotional modules

Black Friday modules may shorten hospital-grade to pro filter for headline space — log promotional strings separately from evergreen PDP copy.

Free gift with purchase modules must not imply upgraded HEPA class when only cosmetic accessories change.

See was/now pricing claims and free gift with purchase claims.

Register hygiene reminder

Date-stamp each CiteBefore scan when suppliers redesign filter cassettes after motor changes — efficiency mismatches are a frequent complaint theme after range refreshes.

Keep EN 1822 or equivalent test PDF filenames in the evidence column even when methodology text is collapsed in accordions.

See claim substantiation and claim register template.

Repairability and spare filters

Repairability score claims concern spare-part availability — they do not replace HEPA class substantiation on the main unit page.

Refill pouch claims on consumables must scope which filter SKU the pouch replaces — log accessory URLs separately.

See repairability score claims and refill pouch claims.

Water-resistant claims on outdoor covers do not substantiate indoor HEPA performance — keep enclosure copy out of the filtration evidence folder.

Star rating widgets must not imply independent verification of HEPA tests — testimonials are not substantiation.

See water-resistant claims and testimonials are not substantiation.

Seasonal campaign rescans

January indoor-air promotions often duplicate last year’s HEPA hero while filter SKUs changed — schedule a CiteBefore rescan before paid search relaunch even when the URL path is unchanged.

Trade-show QR codes sometimes land on shortened mobile heroes that omit EN 1822 class text present on desktop — log both renderings in the register.

See countdown timer advertising claims and limited time offer claims when urgency modules sit beside filtration badges.

Questions

Are HEPA filtration efficiency percentages objective claims on appliance pages?

Stated 99.97% at 0.3 µm and similar HEPA class lines are measurable when scoped to a named test standard. CAP literacy expects substantiation — inventory exact numeric strings.

Must hero HEPA claims match the replaceable filter SKU sold?

Shoppers expect consistency between headline efficiency, filter part numbers and compatible model lists. Log each variant row separately in the register.

Does CiteBefore run filter bench tests?

No. CiteBefore inventories visible advertising copy on submitted URLs. Test reports remain your product compliance folder.

Can True HEPA substitute for H13/E11 class wording?

Markets mix marketing terms with EN 1822 classes — cross-read comparative claims when both appear on one URL.

Do marketplace bullets inherit outdated efficiency figures after filter redesign?

B2B and retail feeds often lag relabelled SKUs. Log merchant and on-site hero strings separately.

Try free scanPricing

All guides: /guides/.